NCERT Solutions · Class 9 Maths · Ganita Manjari Part I · Chapter 3
Chapter 3: The World of Numbers (Number Systems)
Step-by-step solutions to Exercise Sets 3.1 to 3.5 and all End-of-Chapter Exercises of Ganita Manjari (NCERT Class 9 Maths, 2026-27): integers, rational numbers, the number line, irrational numbers, and decimal expansions. All 43 questions are answered, with the key answer highlighted.
A merchant in the port city of Lothal is exchanging bags of spices for copper ingots. He receives 15 ingots for every 2 bags of spices. If he brings 12 bags of spices to the market, how many copper ingots will he leave with?
Solution
12 bags make 12÷2=6 groups of 2 bags. Each group gets 15 ingots.
Look at the sequence of numbers on one column of the Ishango bone: 11, 13, 17, 19. What do these numbers have in common? List the next three numbers that fit this pattern.
Solution
11, 13, 17 and 19 are all prime numbers (each has exactly two factors, 1 and itself). In fact they are exactly the primes between 10 and 20. The primes after 19 are 23, 29 and 31 (21 = 3 × 7, 25 = 5 × 5, 27 = 3 × 9 are not prime).
They are all prime numbers. The next three are 23, 29 and 31.
We know that Natural Numbers are closed under addition (the sum of any two natural numbers is always a natural number). Are they closed under subtraction? Provide a couple of examples to justify your answer.
Solution
No. For closure, the difference of every pair of natural numbers would have to be a natural number, but:
3−5=−2, which is not a natural number.
4−4=0, which is not a natural number (natural numbers start at 1).
(Sometimes the answer is natural, e.g. 9−2=7, but one failing example is enough to break closure.)
No, natural numbers are not closed under subtraction: for example, 3 − 5 = −2 and 4 − 4 = 0 are not natural numbers.
Ancient Indians used the joints of their fingers to count, a practice still seen today. Each finger has 3 joints, and the thumb is used to count them. How many can you count on one hand? How does this relate to the ancient base-12 counting systems?
Solution
The thumb touches the joints (segments) of the other four fingers. Each finger has 3 segments, so one hand gives
4×3=12
So counting naturally goes in groups of 12, which is why base-12 (duodecimal) systems arose. We still see this in a dozen (12), 12 months, and 12 hours on a clock face. If the fingers of the other hand keep track of how many twelves have been counted (up to 5), we reach 12×5=60, which matches the ancient base-60 system still used for minutes and seconds.
12 on one hand (4 fingers × 3 joints). This is the basis of counting in dozens, i.e. a base-12 system.
A spice trader takes a loan (debt) of ₹850. The next day, he makes a profit (fortune) of ₹1,200. The following week, he incurs a loss of ₹450. Write this sequence as an equation using integers and calculate his final financial standing.
Solution
Write debts and losses as negative numbers and fortunes as positive numbers:
(−850)+1200+(−450)=350−450=−100
(−850) + 1200 + (−450) = −100. He is left with a debt of ₹100.
Explain, using a real-world example of debt, why subtracting a negative number is the same as adding a positive number (e.g., 10 − (−5) = 15).
Solution
Suppose your net worth is ₹10, but this includes a debt: you have ₹15 in hand and you owe a friend ₹5, so 15+(−5)=10.
Now the friend says, "Forget the ₹5 you owe me." The debt of ₹5 is taken away (subtracted). You still have ₹15 in hand and owe nothing, so your net worth becomes ₹15.
10−(−5)=15=10+5
Removing a debt makes you richer by exactly the same amount as receiving that much money. So subtracting −5 has the same effect as adding +5.
Taking away a debt of ₹5 increases your worth by ₹5, just like receiving ₹5. Hence 10 − (−5) = 10 + 5 = 15.
Find the rational number x such that: 65(x+53)=65x+21.
Solution
Expand the left side using the distributive law:
65x+65×53=65x+3015=65x+21
So the left side is exactly the same as the right side, whatever x is. The equation is an identity: it is true for every rational number x. (Subtracting 65x from both sides leaves 21=21.)
For example, x=0: LHS =65×53=21 = RHS ✓; x=6: LHS =65×533=211 and RHS =5+21=211 ✓
Every rational number x satisfies the equation (it is an identity, by the distributive law).
Can you think of other way(s) to find a rational number between any two rational numbers?
Solution
Besides taking the average 2a+b, here are some other ways:
Equal denominators, then enlarge: write both numbers with the same denominator and, if their numerators are consecutive, multiply the numerator and denominator by 10. Example: between 31=3010 and 21=3015 we get 3011,3012,…
Mediant (for positive fractions): between ba and dc lies b+da+c. Example: between 31 and 21 lies 52.
Decimals: convert both to decimals and pick a decimal in between. Example: between 31=0.333… and 21=0.5 lies 0.4.
Yes: the mediant b+da+c, the common-denominator method, and the decimal method all give rational numbers between two given rationals.
Without performing long division, determine which of the following rational numbers will have terminating decimals and which will be repeating: 207, 154 and 25013. Then check your answers by explicitly performing the long divisions and expressing these rational numbers as decimals.
Solution
Rule: a fraction in lowest terms has a terminating decimal exactly when its denominator has no prime factors other than 2 and 5.
207: 20=22×5. Terminating. Long division gives 0.35.
154: 15=3×5 has the factor 3. Repeating. Long division gives 0.2666…=0.26.
25013: 250=2×53. Terminating. Long division gives 0.052.
207=0.35 and 25013=0.052 terminate; 154=0.26 repeats.
Perform the long division for 131. Identify the repeating block of digits. Does it show cyclic properties if you evaluate 132? Now compute 133, 134, etc. What do you notice?
Solution
Long division of 1 by 13 gives remainders 10, 9, 12, 3, 4, 1, after which they repeat:
131=0.076923
The repeating block is 076923 (6 digits). But 132=0.153846 uses completely different digits, so it is not a rotation of 076923. Continuing:
Fraction
Decimal
Family
1/13
0.076923...
A
2/13
0.153846...
B
3/13
0.230769...
A
4/13
0.307692...
A
5/13
0.384615...
B
6/13
0.461538...
B
7/13
0.538461...
B
8/13
0.615384...
B
9/13
0.692307...
A
10/13
0.769230...
A
11/13
0.846153...
B
12/13
0.923076...
A
Observation: the twelve fractions split into two families of six. In family A (1, 3, 4, 9, 10, 12) every repeating block is a rotation of 076923; in family B (2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11) every block is a rotation of 153846. So 076923 is not a full cyclic number like 142857 (which works for all of 71 to 76); its period, 6, is only half of 12.
131=0.076923. 132=0.153846 is not a rotation of it. The thirteenths form two cyclic families: rotations of 076923 and rotations of 153846.
Classify the following numbers as rational or irrational: (i) 81 (ii) 12 (iii) 0.33333 ... (iv) 0.123451234512345 ... (v) 1.01001000100001 ... (Notice the pattern: Is it repeating a single block?) (vi) 23.560185612239874790120. Find the explicit fractions in case they are rational.
Solution
(i) 81=9=19. Rational.
(ii) 12=4×3=23. Since 3 is irrational, 23 is irrational (if 23=qp then 3=2qp would be rational). Irrational.
(iii) 0.3333…=0.3. Let x=0.3; 10x=3.3; 9x=3; x=31. Rational.
(iv) 0.12345 (block of 5 digits). Let x=0.12345; 100000x=12345.12345; 99999x=12345; x=9999912345=333334115. Rational.
(v) 1.0100100010000…: the number of zeros between the 1s keeps increasing (1, 2, 3, 4, ...), so no single block repeats and it never terminates. Irrational.
(vi) It terminates (after 21 decimal places), so it is rational: 102123560185612239874790120=25000000000000000000589004640305996869753 in lowest terms.
Rational: (i) 9, (iii) 31, (iv) 333334115, (vi) 25×1018589004640305996869753. Irrational: (ii) and (v).
The number 0.9 (which means 0.99999...) is a rational number. Using algebra (let x=0.9, multiply by 10, and subtract), explain why 0.9 is exactly equal to 1.
Solution
x=0.999…
10x=9.999…
Subtracting the first line from the second, the endless tails of 9s cancel exactly:
9x=9⇒x=1
Another way to see it: 31=0.333…, so 3×31=0.999…, but 3×31=1. There is no number between 0.999... and 1, so they are the same point on the number line.
We have seen that the repeating block of 71 is a cyclic number. Try to find more numbers (n) whose reciprocals (n1) produce decimals with repeating blocks that are cyclic.
Solution
The block is cyclic when the decimal of n1 has the longest possible period, n−1 digits (then every remainder 1, 2, ..., n − 1 appears in the long division). This happens for the primes 7, 17, 19, 23, 29, 47, 59, 61, 97, ...
Example, n=17:
171=0.0588235294117647(16 digits)
172=0.1176470588235294,173=0.1764705882352941,…
Each is the same block started at a different place, so 0588235294117647 is cyclic, just like 142857. (191 gives the 18-digit cyclic block 052631578947368421.) For 13 this fails (see Q2), since its period is only 6.
For example n = 17, 19, 23, 29, 47, 59, 61, 97 (primes for which n1 has period n − 1). E.g. 171=0.0588235294117647 is cyclic.
Convert the following rational numbers in the form of a terminating decimal or non-terminating and repeating decimal, whichever the case may be, by the process of long division: (i) 503 (ii) 92
Solution
(i) 50=2×52, so it terminates: 3÷50=0.06 (since 503=1006).
(ii) 2÷9: each step leaves remainder 2 again, so the digit 2 repeats forever: 0.222…
(i) 503=0.06 (terminating) (ii) 92=0.2 (non-terminating, repeating)
Convert the following decimal numbers in the form of qp: (i) 12.6 (ii) 0.0120 (iii) 3.052 (iv) 1.235 (v) 0.23 (vi) 2.05 (vii) 2.125 (viii) 3.125 (ix) 2.1625
Solution
Terminating decimals:
(i) 12.6=10126=563(ii) 0.0120=10000120=2503
(iii) x=3.052: one non-repeating digit, two repeating digits.
Locate the following rational numbers on the number line. (i) 0.532 (ii) 1.15
Solution
We use successive magnification: zoom into the right interval one decimal place at a time.
(i) 0.532 lies between 0.5 and 0.6; within that, between 0.53 and 0.54; and it is the 2nd of the ten thousandth marks after 0.53.
Locating 0.532 by successive magnification
(ii) 1.15=1.1555… lies between 1.1 and 1.2; then between 1.15 and 1.16; then between 1.155 and 1.156, and so on, always closer to the right end. As a fraction, 1.15=90104=4552: divide the interval from 1 to 2 into 45 equal parts and take 7 parts after 1.
Locating 1.1555... (just past 1.155)
0.532 is 2 thousandths after 0.53; 1.15(=4552) lies between 1.155 and 1.156.
Let a and b be two non-zero rational numbers such that a+b1=0. Without assigning any numerical values, determine whether ab is positive or negative. Justify your answer.
Solution
From a+b1=0 we get a=−b1. Multiply both sides by b (allowed, since b=0):
A rational number has a terminating decimal expansion whose last non-zero digit occurs in the 4th decimal place. Show that such a number can be written in the form 104p, where p is an integer not divisible by 10. Is it necessary that the denominator of this rational number, when written in the lowest form, is divisible by 24 or 54? Give reasons.
Solution
Let the number be x=N.d1d2d3d4, where N is the integer part and d4=0 is the last non-zero digit. Multiplying by 104 moves the decimal point 4 places, giving an integer:
p=104x=Nd1d2d3d4⇒x=104p
The last digit of p is d4=0, so p is not divisible by 10.
Now 104p=24×54p. To reach lowest terms we can cancel only factors of 2 or 5 that divide p. Since p is not divisible by 10, p cannot be divisible by both 2 and 5:
If p is odd, no factor 2 cancels, so the denominator keeps 24.
If p is not a multiple of 5, no factor 5 cancels, so the denominator keeps 54.
At least one of these is always true. Examples: 0.0002=1042=50001=23×541 (divisible by 54 but not 24); 0.0005=20001=24×531 (divisible by 24 but not 54).
Yes. The lowest-terms denominator is always divisible by 24 or by 54 (at least one of them, not necessarily both), because p cannot cancel factors of both 2 and 5.
Without performing division, determine whether the decimal expansion of 12518 is terminating or non-terminating. If it terminates, state the number of decimal places.
Solution
12518 is in lowest terms and 125=53 has only the prime factor 5, so the decimal terminates. To make the denominator a power of 10, multiply by 23:
12518=53×2318×8=1000144=0.144
It terminates, with 3 decimal places (12518=0.144).
A rational number in its lowest form has denominator 23×5. How many decimal places will its decimal expansion have? Explain your answer.
Solution
Let the number be 23×5p=40p in lowest terms, so p has no factor 2 or 5. Multiply numerator and denominator by 52 to get a power of 10:
23×5p=23×5325p=100025p
So there are at most 3 decimal places. The last digit of 25p is not 0 (p is odd, so 25p ends in 25 or 75), so the third decimal place is non-zero. Example: 401=0.025, 403=0.075.
Exactly 3 decimal places, because the larger of the powers of 2 and 5 in the denominator is 3.
Let a=127 and b=65. Express both a and b in the form mk1 and mk2 where k1, k2 and m are integers and k2−k1>6. Using the same denominator m, write exactly five distinct rational numbers lying between a and b keeping an integer numerator. Explain why the condition k2−k1>n+1 is necessary to find n such rational numbers between the two rational numbers a and b using this method.
Solution
With m=12: a=127, b=1210, so k2−k1=3, too small. Multiply by 3, i.e. take m=36:
a=3621,b=3630,k2−k1=30−21=9>6
Five rational numbers between them:
3622,3623,3624,3625,3626
Why the condition: the fractions mk strictly between mk1 and mk2 are those with k=k1+1,k1+2,…,k2−1. There are exactly k2−k1−1 such integers. To get n numbers we need k2−k1−1≥n, that is k2−k1≥n+1. The condition k2−k1>n+1 (here 9>6) guarantees this, with at least one numerator to spare. If the gap is too small (as with m = 12), we simply enlarge m.
a=3621, b=3630; five numbers: 3622,3623,3624,3625,3626. There are only k2−k1−1 integers between k1 and k2, so the gap must exceed n for n numerators to fit.
Show that the rational number 2(a+b) lies between the rational numbers a and b.
Solution
Suppose a<b, so b−a>0. Then
2a+b−a=2b−a>0⇒2a+b>a
b−2a+b=2b−a>0⇒2a+b<b
So a<2a+b<b. It is rational because the sum of two rationals is rational and dividing a rational by 2 gives a rational. In fact it is exactly the midpoint, at distance 2b−a from each end.
Find the lengths of the hypotenuses of all the right triangles in Fig. 3.14 which is referred to as the square root spiral.
Solution
In the spiral, the first triangle has both legs 1. Every next triangle uses the previous hypotenuse as one leg and a new leg of length 1, with a right angle between them. By the Baudhayana-Pythagoras theorem:
h1=12+12=2,h2=(2)2+12=3,h3=3+1=4=2,…
Each new hypotenuse is n+1 when the previous one is n. Fig. 3.14 has 10 triangles, so the hypotenuses are